false control: February 2010

Sunday, February 7, 2010

True or False. The falling satellite that's going to crash into Earth is now being controlled by Jesus Christ?

What do you think about this??True or False. The falling satellite that's going to crash into Earth is now being controlled by Jesus Christ?
have another bong towely

i amTrue or False. The falling satellite that's going to crash into Earth is now being controlled by Jesus Christ?
yes you do control the satellites
But Jesus can be foiled only by David Hyde Pierce and a device for generative integers uniformly at random between 1 and 20!
If True, then get down on your knees and repent of your evil ways now.

If False, then bend over and kiss your backside good-bye.
Yes, in the ultimate sense, of course. But not in some special unusual way, only in the sense that He controls everything.
Wtf are you on.?
Yeah.

He really works for NASA.
Oh My God... ITS TRUE!!!!!!

HEY GRAVITY IS ONLY A T-H-E-O-R-Y!! (lol...)

Caps Lock is cruise control for AWESOME.
Ah thats gravity and human idiocity.
Are you saying that there may be something to the ';Sky Daddy'; moniker?
True, but it will not crash into earth for another 200 years because Jesus can't figure out how to use it.
I'll say ';true'; because I do believe in God and His control over everything.
false!
Creationism proves there is no satellite. I learned it in Sunday School. Atheists, ruled by Satan, say there's a satellite just to test our faith.
False!!!.. I think its his dad thats doing the controling!!

Americans: Has your zionist controlled media successfully ';prep'd'; you for the next CIA/Mossad false flag op.?

Goebbels would be proud of you.

Far right controlled FOX News admitted their Obama/Islam link is false. Can we end this now?

..finally, they showed some integrity. Obama isn't a Muslim, and didn't attend a Madrassa. I have the FOX videotape. Will the Far Right on Yahoo Answers now cease their rediculous smear attempts?

http://youtube.com/watch?v=jBVMcLhx6DIFar right controlled FOX News admitted their Obama/Islam link is false. Can we end this now?
bite my is wrong it wasn't retrated he same the day,it was retracted after the obama capaign mailed fox and cnn actually did what journalist suppose to do and went to he madrassa instead of sit back and sling mud.

and as the people who say barack obama is racist because his church likes farakan,then why the hell mitt romney isn't racist when his bible the book of mormon was written by a racist and has racist scripture in it!

and whats so hallirous is people who say obama is a muslim,obama this obama that when they get confronted about it will bklame it on the clintons,just look at the post above,all the people who blame this on clinton have been asking question about obama's pastFar right controlled FOX News admitted their Obama/Islam link is false. Can we end this now?
Umm Obama is an Islamic name. It rhymes with his best friend Osama.
WE DONT NEED TO TRY AND SMEAR YOU, YOUR OWN PARTY HAS BEEN DOING A GOOD JOB OF THAT.. ALA HILLARY CLINTON. WHAT GIVES DEMS A REASON TO VOTE DEM THIS ELECTION IS BEYOND ME.
I have never claimed he went to a ';madrassa.'; He was raised Muslim. That sir, is a fact. Now he is a ';blacks only,'; ';African'; christian. Much better right?
Perhaps for a minute, until they come up with a new smear.
The concern I had was confirmed on Hannity's show tonight, on Fox by the way, when an African-American Reverend, who is supporting Hillary Clinton, had a long discussion about how Obama has close ties with Louis Farrakhan and how ';everybody knows Farrakhan is a Racist';.....And the point he made was those who are racists in the black community who have openly denounced any respect or kinship with the white community, can get away with the racist remarks, whereas a white person stating the same thing about a black person, is considered Racist. He specifically mentioned Obama's pastor and political mentor, Jeremiah Wright, Jr. If the voters really want to know the truth it is out there. The concerns about Obama go much deeper than his Muslim ties/roots/family history/background.
That is old news. It was retracted the same day it was run. It still doesn't negate his being a racist ex-crackhead, which is simply a statement of fact. Also, his middle name, Hussein, is a Muslim name, regardless of how you try and spin it.

Edit: They retracted it 2 days later and I stand corrected.. Now on the the Muslim bit. At the public school he attended, he was listed as being a Muslim. The school required religion to be identified because a 2 hour prayer period was part of the curriculum. His step father was a Muslim, just like his father. He was known to attend the Mosque with his step father on occasion. Those facts are known and he hasn't denied them.

I was wondering. If I was running as a conservative and had attended a few KKK rallies with my father as a youngster, would the media defend me when I claimed that I was not a racist?
They will keep saying it either because they are ignorant or they don't want to look bad.
You imply FOX said earlier that Obama is Muslim. But I never heard any such thing from FOX news. So it isn't 'their' link. It is simply rumors that spread on the internet.

I think any time I have ever heard Fox News address Obama's religion is tell of his history which clearly shows he is no longer Muslim. And I think they have also addressed the ';black separatist'; church he goes to now.
We can and we should.

There is never a need to slight someone based on false information.

In Obama's case, there's plenty of legitimate reasons to not elect him President.

Such as:

1. He wants to give driver's licenses to illegal aliens (link #1)

2. He has attended a church for 20 years which all but bars Whites and other races from attending (link #2)

3. That same church pledges it's allegiance to Africa and not the US.

4. He refuses to put his hand over his heart when our national anthem is played (link #3)

--------------

Geez, Mike (who answered below). I've heard a lot of ignorant, paranoid answers on this forum before, but yours might be a new record. I personally have never spread rumors about Obama being Muslim, but with a name like Obama Hussein Barack, I can certainly see how that conclusion or hypothesis would be possible.

Given Obama's church just gave one of it's annual awards to Louis Farrakhan, a man who is both Muslim and a racist, it's not even remotely a logical statement to say that anyone who opposes Obama is a racist or neo-Nazi. The award was given to him for being a man who ';truly epitomized greatness.'; Now I don't know about you, but if my church did that, especially if I was running for President, but even if I wasn't, I would be an ex-member the very next day.

Personally I don't care what the color or sex of a candidate is. I want someone loyal to our country and it's people, someone who can unite ALL the people in our country and move our country forward. CLEARLY that is not something Obama is capable of, and it has nothing to do with his race (he is half-White after all).

Please put a little more thought into your answers before using terms such as neo-Nazi. You seem to be unclear on the concept.
and even if he was ....so what? This is America, a nation that prides itself on its religious tolerance, freedom etc. The fact people are considering religion as a smear attempt shows that America has not really progressed at all.
I wish... but unfortunately the Republicans that watch tv usually watch the Simpsons reruns, not the news.
tin foil's right. Hillary has been sending out stuff on Obama. Uh oh! Imagine that. One of your own.
And, you may now want to contact Hillary. Her peeps sent out e mails regarding Obama. And her advisor brought up his drug past. Sooooooooooo,don't try and pin it all on Fox.
PEOPLE!!! Stop with the Muslim or not question!! So what if he is a Muslim?! Since when does the constitution say that one must be a Christian in order to run for President? We are sounding as stupid as the generation of Kennedy did when they were scared that he would turn the country over to the Pope because he was Catholic.

If he is Muslim or not, it should not matter. Remember, Muslims are not the enemy--ignorant people are. Catholics, Protestants, Jews, and others can ALL be dangerous if they are ignorant. Senator Obama is not dangerous.

Americans, do not get stuck on the little issues. We are entering an economic recession and we continue to be in a war--lets not forget.
NeoNazis and conartists will do everything in their rhetorical news power not to allow someone that isn't a pure white and a man the Presidency. Will the wealthy continue to profit exorbitantly if a working class person becomes president?
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6737097743434902428

fox news is fixed and false ... everyone know that ... except for brainwashed sheeple.
They will never stop. Now that it's started it will just keep going.

Nuclear Fusion in stars is controlled by the dependence of density and mass? True or False?

Cant find this in my Astronomy book. Please helpNuclear Fusion in stars is controlled by the dependence of density and mass? True or False?
Nuclear fusion in stars is controlled by temperature. In the case of our sun, it's another way of saying how fast protons move around in the core. The more gravitational pressure on the core, the faster those little suckers move around. If the gravitational pressure is sufficient, the protons in the core of the star are zipping along so fast that the temperature goes to around 10 million Kelvin (10 million degrees above absolute zero). That's where something interesting happens. The protons get close enough to one another to overcome the strong nuclear force (the positive charge) that normally keeps protons apart. The protons fuse together in the high energy collisions, emitting gamma rays and neutrinos in the process. That's your nuclear fusion. Lots of high energy gamma rays pushing outward from the core, holding the inward gravitational pressure in equilibrium. If the core runs out of hydrogen to fuse, it shuts off. Nuclear fusion stops. The temperature goes down. This causes the sun's mass to to start weighing down on the core again, there's nothing to hold up the star from further collapse. Eventually, the temperature in the core again starts to go up because of the increasing inward pressure. If the now-helium core can get to 100 million degrees Kelvin, helium fusion is possible, and once again the star is held up by the outward pressure of the helium fusion. Temperature controls. But mass/density and the force of gravity make it happen in the first place.Nuclear Fusion in stars is controlled by the dependence of density and mass? True or False?
Your question is non-sequitor.

As gas compresses, it heats up and gets denser. At some point the heat is enough to engage fusion. A star is born. Fusion isn't so much controlled as it just happens. The gas mixture and total mass are the most basic variables for fusion.

If you re-word the question, you will get better answers. Try again!
Sounds like this is one of ';those'; questions-the ones which are asked and seem to make little sense. It seems well explained above and I'd agree but I'm not an astronomer.

Look in your notes or ask someone who remembers very well what happens in class, maybe the professor worded something similarly that can point to towards what the real intention of the question is.
Nuclear fusion in stars is caused by the inward pull of gravity and the outward push of the energy produced by the fusion. In the different life stages of the star these two things constantly battle to maintain a balance.

CNN & BBC is a controlled media broadcast by the goverment . True or False?

I cannot answer for CNN but although the BBC are subsidized by the government with the TV license, it is self governing and is run by its board of directors and is not influenced by the governmentCNN %26amp; BBC is a controlled media broadcast by the goverment . True or False?
False.CNN %26amp; BBC is a controlled media broadcast by the goverment . True or False?
False.
true, but more like shadow/secret government. same people who print the money in your wallet. Rothschild/Rockefeller/Vatican

/Jesuits/Royals/Satanists

that's the red pill, what else is new?

Is it either false that a person has free will or it is false that God controls everything?

If a person has free will, then a person determines their own actions.

If God controls everything, then He determines the action of a person.

If He determines the action of a person, then it is false that a person determines their own actions.

It is false that a person determines their own actions and it is false that a person determines their own actions.

Therefore, it is either that it is false that a person has free will or it is false that God controls everything.Is it either false that a person has free will or it is false that God controls everything?
no games oh please

GOD HAS THE ULTIMATE DECISIONS

you get freewill for this lifetime then it runs out...Is it either false that a person has free will or it is false that God controls everything?
These two points are a contrarity, not a contradiction. So it is not valid to assume that one is false if the other is true. Before we can make that assumption we have to define the first statement within the context of the second; i.e. ';Freewill means freedom from the providence of God, the laws of necessity, natural law, cause and effect, etc.';
That is exactly right.

It is also false to say that God is All Knowing and free will exists.

They cannot coexist. If God knows the future, then he created Lucifer knowing he would sin and create the need for Hell and eternal damnation for most of mankind. That makes the theory of a Loving God impossible as well.

Too many inconsistencies for any of it to be true.
yes a person does have free will and god does control everything the situation will stay the same but depending on your choice of action from your free will the out come will be different each time.
Nowhere in the bible does it mention free will. Many times throughout the bible it discusses god's predestination. Yet christians think they have free will. But they can't show us scripture for it!
free will. God controls what He owns.
Study ';Fractal Geometry'; and you will mathematically see how both can happen simultaneously.
Free will does not exist.

Romans 9:18

So then He has mercy on whomever He wills (chooses) and He hardens (makes stubborn and unyielding the heart of) whomever He wills.
Gods do not exist, and neither does free will.
I believe in free will, myself. But I understand your point that free will and determinism are mutually exclusive.
I'm sorry but did you just repeat that line you got me confused.
It is false that God controls everything. God relinquished control when He gave human beings free will. Which is why we are totally responsible for our own free will decisions. Which is why it is inappropriate to ask ';why did God let this happen?'; when some human beings commit an atrocity against others.
neither is false to me. i had this explained to me once as an essay a teacher assigns you to write. they will tell you how long it should be, what format to use, what the theme is, and then helps answer your questions or mistakes. this is the role of god. you, the writer, then fill in the blanks and come up with your story or essay based on what the teacher specified, but the writing is still your work, isnt it? you still choose what is put to paper when-you just have some guidelines. free will is there, so is a divine power.

facial hair

The controlling statement of a switch statement can be an int or a float. True or False?

Which language are you using?

In Java, C, C++, the answer is False.

It can be an int, but it can't be a float.

Nuclear Fusion in stars is controlled by the dependence of density and mass? True or False?

Cant find this in my astornomy book please help.Nuclear Fusion in stars is controlled by the dependence of density and mass? True or False?
Hm, I think its false....but don't take my word for it.Nuclear Fusion in stars is controlled by the dependence of density and mass? True or False?
Are you asking if the rate of Fusion, how quickly the star is ';burning'; its nuclear fuel, I do believe it is dependant on the mass of the star. A larger star will burn its fuel more quickly, however there will be more fuel for it to burn.
I think it's true.

The cerebellum regulates and controls unconscious respiration: TRUE OR FALSE. IF false what does?

FALSE

Cerebellum controls movement and coordination. The respiratory centre is in the medulla oblongata in the lower part of the brain stem.

You can think of the functions of the brain as becoming more and more primitive the further down you go towards the spinal cord, if that helps.The cerebellum regulates and controls unconscious respiration: TRUE OR FALSE. IF false what does?
False, cerebellum coordinates fine movements and takes in unconscious sensory information (like keeping you from rolling off the bed when you are asleep). The brainstem controls respiration.The cerebellum regulates and controls unconscious respiration: TRUE OR FALSE. IF false what does?
that's likely a brain stem function.

actions needed to sustain life are generally brain stem functions.

brain stem never sleeps.

True or false english laws controlling trade in the colonies were always strictly enforced

it's a badly-worded question, but if your textbook emphasized that there were english laws that controlled trade in the colonies, then it's probably true

however, like the above answerer stated, to the word ';always'; is a red flag as there are usually exceptions

mercantilism was extremely strong with the control of trade in the colonies - you can look it up on either wikipedia or dictionary.comTrue or false english laws controlling trade in the colonies were always strictly enforced
Tip: Anything something says ';always'; should be a red flag. Is speeding in America ALWAYS enforced? No, because ';always'; is impossible. Now that you know that, go back to your textbook and read about trading in the colonies and see what it says... good luck!True or false english laws controlling trade in the colonies were always strictly enforced
English attempts to control trade with it's North American were very ineffective. The coastline was much too long to prevent smuggling.

Didn't HITLER run false ';Fact Check'; articles to in the state controlled media as he was rising to power?

I think it actually evolved into the same Associated Press outfit that was eventually purchased by George Soros too.Didn't HITLER run false ';Fact Check'; articles to in the state controlled media as he was rising to power?
Yes he did, and Herr David Axelrod the Obama propaganda minister is doing his best to give false information on the Obama Care Scam

Axelrod is just following his mentors statement

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”

Joseph Goebbels - Hitlers Propaganda MinisterDidn't HITLER run false ';Fact Check'; articles to in the state controlled media as he was rising to power?
Yes, Hitler did control the Press, seems someone in the USA is doing the same, very scary and very real without a doubt. What's with the internment camp guard recruitment....is it coincidence also....I hope not.
Not sure. Prescott Bush was heavily involved in aiding Hitler's rise to power, funding a lot of it.

Maybe ';Dubya'; knows something about it.
Hitler didn't have Annenberg's Factcheck.org; he just burned books instead. He had Joseph Goebbels, we now have David Axelrod and Robert Gibbs.
there was no ';Fact Check'; under the Nazis.

Whatever they said was right.

Kind of how Rush and Faux News works.
LOL! Why yes, I believe he did!!!!! I love humor!!!
Yes!
No. You're thinking, of course, of all those journalists bush paid to publish propaganda pieces on the Iraq War.

http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-1598705.…

Or possibly you're remembering the huge Rupert Murdoch sweeping media blitz leading up to the Iraq War - which influenced (brainwashed) pretty much all of Congress and the populace into a glassy-eyed acquiescence.

http://www.rightweb.irc-online.org/profi…

http://www.newscorpse.com/ncWP/?p=341
Are you kidding?

TRUE OR FALSE: Mitochondria controls their own reproduction?

False. The amount of energy does.

Mitochondria replicate their DNA and divide mainly in response to the energy needs of the cell. In other words, their growth and division is not linked to the cell cycle. When the energy needs of a cell are high, mitochondria grow and divide. When the energy use is low, mitochondria are destroyed or become inactive. At cell division, mitochondria are distributed to the daughter cells essentially randomly during the division of the cytoplasm. Mitochondria divide by binary fission similar to bacterial cell division; unlike bacteria, however, mitochondria can also fuse with other mitochondria.TRUE OR FALSE: Mitochondria controls their own reproduction?
False - biogenesis is controlled in coordination with the cells other responses to stress.

The organelle is semi-autonomous but the greater part of its genome is in the nucleus. Thus the reproduction is under the nucleus' control, responding to cell division and physiological stresses, and not the mitochondria's control. However the exact pathway for biogenesis is yet to be worked out but mitochondrial transcription factor A (mtTFA) is key to the process of mammalian mitochondrial replication in responce to stress. mtTFA is on chromosome 10 of the nucleus.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob鈥?/a>

Though mitochondria have lost or transfered some of their genome to the cell nucleus they do still retain many. Human mitochondria retain some 37 genes, 13 are critical for cellular respiration. They translate their own mRNA on mitochondrial ribosomes but the nuclear genes are translated cellularly and the proteins are imported for use.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10412鈥?/a>

http://www.bmb.leeds.ac.uk/illingworth/o鈥?/a>

http://www.jbc.org/cgi/content/abstract/鈥?/a>

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondri鈥?/a>TRUE OR FALSE: Mitochondria controls their own reproduction?
False. They produce energy.

facial hair

True or False The dominant factor controlling the conduct of the war was geography?

True, in the sense that we're only in Iraq to suck every drop of OIL out of that country's sands. -RKO-True or False The dominant factor controlling the conduct of the war was geography?
We're in Iraq for two reasons. They're sitting on the second largest oil reserve in the world. And we're building bases there. It's all about money and power.True or False The dominant factor controlling the conduct of the war was geography?
False. The dominant factor is humanistic- terrorists.
True.

Do Americans realize Rep, Dem, Con, Lib are false keywords used to formulate consensus and control the masses?

What Presidential Candidates are part of the Council on Foreign Relations?

Fred Thompson

Rudy Giuliani

John McCain

Mitt Romney

Jim Gilmore

Newt Gingrich

Hillary Clinton

Barack Obama

John Edwards

Joe Biden

Chris Dodd

Bill Richardson

What are they trying to accomplish?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vo5CZvD3-鈥?/a>

Building a North American Union is the blueprint contrived by globalist groups like the CFR and Bilderberg. The North American Union is proposed to subvert the sovereign government of the United States of America.

Who Opposes the CFR?

Ron PaulDo Americans realize Rep, Dem, Con, Lib are false keywords used to formulate consensus and control the masses?
As a resident, I can honestly tell you that no, the overwhelming majority (95+%) don't have a clue. They buy into the whole Dems vs. GOPs vs. kooks (Libertarians, Socialists, Green party, etc...). I will say this in their defense: the acting is so good that, unless you know, I can see how it would be easy to want to take sides. All the bile and malcontent that gets spread from one party against another, and vice versa. And let's not forget all of the talking heads that are out in the media, plying their trade for their desired ';party's'; best interest.

As for the North American Union, that's just the next step now that the EU has stabilized (for the most part). Eventually, I can see such ';unions'; forming across South America and Africa; for that matter, Chavez and Ahmadinejad already talked about creating a union between those two continents. Once they fall in step, it wouldn't be a far cry for the UN order to be implemented.

By the way, on a sidenote, in case you've never read it, might I suggest ';The Illuminatus! Trilogy'; by Robert Shea and Robert Anton Wilson? Fantastic book! It's a very easy read, and even though it was published some thirty years ago, it's disturbing on how dead-on they are on many of the issues they touch on.

* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Illumin鈥?/a>

* http://www.rawilson.com/illuminatus.htmlDo Americans realize Rep, Dem, Con, Lib are false keywords used to formulate consensus and control the masses?
Republicans

Herbert Hoover (1928,32)

Wendell Wilkie (1940)

Thomas Dewey (1944,48)

Dwight Eisenhower (1952,56)

Richard Nixon (1960,68,72)

Gerald Ford (1976)

George Bush (1988,92) (who was also a director of the CFR 1977-1979)

Report Abuse

Thank you so very much. But I still think gas cost to much.
Nope. Americans are as ';clue-less'; as YOU are, for asking the question in the FIRST place in this forum. I'm afraid you're in the rarefied air of the upper, intellectual Stratosphere -where nobody has a CLUE of what you're talking about. Save your breath- %26amp; get OUT THERE and make your point. Only ';Actions'; speak to the deaf %26amp; dumb. :)
I pray for Ron Paul's success in the coming elections, and wish him good luck, please God.
although these names all look familiar to me, nobody controls me, but I am an exception to the rule.

Do Americans realize Rep, Dem, Con, Lib are false keywords used to formulate consensus and control the masses?

True or false:Controlling inflation is more important than controlling unemployment.?

idea 1: inflation has an ';invisible hand'; to control it...ie when inflation devalues the american dollar to a certain point; people spend substatially less money on luxuries, and luxury item companies react and make their product more affordable...which is reflected in a sort of ratio of cost between necessities and luxuries and whatever falls inbetween... now idea 2: we, as a nation, expect unemployment. we have a certain, budgeted amount of money set aside to compensate for that. Now lets assume two things...1 - that idea 1 is true and that idea 2 is true. 2 - that in the instance that this original question is posed, neither inflation nor unemployment is so out of control that it is causing ';economic anarchy'; Assuming all of this... it would make it more important to control inflation because it is not prepared for in the same way that unemployment is...plus (as a side note, and you thought i was done...) inflation causes each dollar to be worth less money...therefore, theorhetically, people are recieving smaller paychecks...and it leads some to get secondary (or even tertiary) jobs or to work additional hours, which begins to take up hours that are availible from employers...and when companies move less product, they have less hours of work to provide to those that work for them....think about it...True or false:Controlling inflation is more important than controlling unemployment.?
That is actually a very interesting question. During the great depression in the 30s the US was hit very hard with unemployment. When the great depression hit Germany (for example), inflation was the real killer of their economy.

Because of what happened during the great depression the US government has done what they could to control spiralling unemployment rates, because that's where the pain was. In most of Europe, they try to contain inflation. In a macro-economic way 1 does do a little to control the other.True or false:Controlling inflation is more important than controlling unemployment.?
I think both go hand in hand in some shape or form.

Democrat control both the House & Senate how is it the false of the GOP that we don't have Healthcare yet ?

and oh yeah and is it true even if we get it pass it wouldn't come into effect until 2014 ? but cost would start the day it pass...Democrat control both the House %26amp; Senate how is it the false of the GOP that we don't have Healthcare yet ?
The GOP could not stop this even if they wanted to (and trust me they do). The reason there has not been a health care bill is because Democrats in the House want a public option and the Democrats in the Senate do not (or at least do not want to say they voted for it).

Another reason this is failing to pass is because the American people are finally waking up to the fact that this bill is a power grab and about paying off special interest groups.

If they where serious about solving the health care problem they would allow people to buy health insurance across state lines and place limits on malpractice suits (would reduce cost by reducing defensive medicine).

P.S. the bill in ';budget neutral'; because the taxes and fees are begin in the first year the bill takes effect but the actual 'reforms' do not take place until 2014. In other words they front load the revenue but back load the cost which allows them to falsely claim that the bill is 'budget neutral' for the first few years.Democrat control both the House %26amp; Senate how is it the false of the GOP that we don't have Healthcare yet ?
Obviously , they don't want to put it in effect until after the next election. That way, no one will see the dismal failure it will be until Obama gets reelected (I dread the thought) and then it will be too late.

As for me, I say, everyone should just pay the fine, no one buy insurance until they get sick, because they won't be able to turn you down. of course it will bankrupt the system, but what the hell, we're on a downhill slide into depression and there's no stopping it.
Because the insurance companies have managed to buy out the Blue Dog Democrats to sabotage the reform the USA needs.

FACT - Insurance companies in the USA admit to pushing up prices, buying politicians and not paying out claims when they should [1]

FACT - PER PERSON the USA spends more on healthcare than any other nation on the planet [2]

FACT - Obama debated his plans before the election for healthcare [3]

FACT - the chance of a child under five of dying in the USA is greater than industrialised nations with universal health coverage [4]

FACT - Obama was elected by the American people to bring in change [5]

FACT - Obama wants to stop insurance companies from screwing American鈥檚 [6]

FACT - The reforms Obama wants work in the Netherlands and Switzerland [7]

Let me know if my facts are wrong, but please provide proof.
It isn't. The problem with the Democrat party is that the Socialist wing lead by Botox Pelosi and Retard Reid are trying to ram their Socialist idiocy down the collective throats of the working class. A few of the Democrats whose political views are not to the left of Karl Marx are resisting the effort.
I think you mean ';fault'; not false

anyway, it is the GOPs fault because several of the democrats- baucus and Ben Nelson for example are really republicans
By lying and rousing the masses to question it...also known as ';obstruction';.

(It will be budget neutral...you should learn to listen).
Yeah spending a trillion is budget neutral LOLOLOLOL!
budget neutral .. what a joke ... they have lied to us over and over again

facial hair

FileUpload Control of ASP.Net2 always shows HasFile=false. I dont know why?

Hello All,

I am using FileUpload which is in cell of table. I am selecting file from local drive but when I click on Submit Button it shows no file. That is HasFile=false always.

I have one Update Panel in my page but FileUpload Control is out side of UpdatePanel.

I am also want that Multiple Files and attach it from another form. Like yahoo file attachment process.

How can I do that.

Please help me.

FileUpload Control of ASP.Net2 always shows HasFile=false. I dont know why?
Do you have permission to upload to your local directory? Can you post your code? Here's what I've used in the past:

protected void Button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)

{

if (FileUpload1.HasFile)

{

FileUpload1.SaveAs(@';C:\Inetpub\wwwroot\鈥?+ FileUpload1.FileName);

Label1.Text = ';File Uploaded: '; + FileUpload1.FileName;

}

else

{

Label1.Text = ';No File Uploaded.';;

}

}

UPDATE:

Have you tried debugging? Have you added the asp.net user to the folder (ComputerName/ASPNET)?

Do Americans realize Rep, Dem, Con, Lib are false keywords used to formulate consensus and control the masses?

What Presidential Candidates are part of the Council on Foreign Relations?

Fred Thompson

Rudy Giuliani

John McCain

Mitt Romney

Jim Gilmore

Newt Gingrich

Hillary Clinton

Barack Obama

John Edwards

Joe Biden

Chris Dodd

Bill Richardson

What are they trying to accomplish?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vo5CZvD3-鈥?/a>

Building a North American Union is the blueprint contrived by globalist groups like the CFR and Bilderberg. The North American Union is proposed to subvert the sovereign government of the United States of America.

Who Opposes the CFR?

Ron PaulDo Americans realize Rep, Dem, Con, Lib are false keywords used to formulate consensus and control the masses?
The answer NO! Most Americans don't have individual thought on political matters. They are part of the herd. The herd that roams in TV news land, they are told what is true and never look for the facts to back up what they have heard. You probably bring up this questions because you have heard it or similar to it before.

When I think there is a false claim I like to find what hurts people most, the truth. I am glad not to be a part of any herd.Do Americans realize Rep, Dem, Con, Lib are false keywords used to formulate consensus and control the masses?
Hmmmm.........makes you stop and think.
Do Americans realize that ';false keywords';, ';formulate consensus';, ';control the masses';, and ';contrived by globalist'; are catch-phrases designed by crackpots like Alex Jones to sell conspiracy-theory DVDs on their websites to the paranoid ?
Does Homer realize that Americans will not listen to condescending remarks like, ';Do Americans realize that ya-da-ya-da-ya-da are false keywords used to formulate consensus and control the masses?'; ?

One thing that I always know for sure: as soon as someone starts talking about how Americans have been fooled and controlled by some kind of elite, the person making such a remark is obviously an elitist himself.
If he is of the pure Germanic Aryan blood, then I will vote for Ron Paul!
Yes - some of us realize it. I think most average Americans still don't ';get it'; though ........

True or False: All nervous system responses are vouluntary, or under your control.?

please be serious!!!True or False: All nervous system responses are vouluntary, or under your control.?
False - only the responses of the somatic nervous system (SNS) are under voluntary control. The responses of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) are NOT. e.g. the obvious - breathing, your heart pumping blood, etcTrue or False: All nervous system responses are vouluntary, or under your control.?
False, eye twitching etc. are involuntary
False, actions such as heart beat or digestion are involuntary and controlled by either smooth or cardiac muscles. Reflexes are also involuntary.
false ex=knee jerks as you fall asleep
False: Some reflex reactions actually never reach the brain. Intense pain sensations can cause an automatic neural responses, like pulling your hand back from hitting something sharp, or something too hot, before the sensation has even been relayed to the brain.
I don't remember but I'll say:

False.

What frightens you more: the false/controlling impact most Religions has on it's people or Government?

Actually, it's the impact religious people have in my government.What frightens you more: the false/controlling impact most Religions has on it's people or Government?
Government.What frightens you more: the false/controlling impact most Religions has on it's people or Government?
Your avatar. :)
One very big difference. Churches are not allowed to use deadly force to require its members to do things. The government does it regularly.
Government.
neither, God is on His throne, this world is His footstool.

O LORD of hosts, blessed is the man that trusteth in thee. Lord, thou hast been favourable unto thy land: thou hast brought back the captivity of Jacob. Thou hast forgiven the iniquity of thy people, thou hast covered all their sin. Selah. Thou hast taken away all thy wrath: thou hast turned thyself from the fierceness of thine anger. Turn us, O God of our salvation, and cause thine anger toward us to cease. Psalm 84:12

The head of that statue was made of fine gold, its breast and its arms of silver, its belly and its thighs of bronze, its legs of iron, its feet partly of iron and partly of clay. You continued looking until a stone was cut out without hands, and it struck the statue on its feet of iron and clay and crushed them. Then the iron, the clay, the bronze, the silver and the gold were crushed all at the same time and became like chaff from the summer threshing floors; and the wind carried them away so that not a trace of them was found. But the stone that struck the statue became a great mountain and filled the whole earth. Daniel 2:32

the children of God have a reason to smile. we know what is coming.
I am scared of ego and ego alone. That is the root of all problem...those who live for self and material desire.
Religion!!! By far!!!

The crusades, Hitler, the terroists, lthe list goes on and on.....
Government. Religion has no place in government. Not any, no where, none. Zero. It scares me people can take away my civil rights (not really, we are just denied them) because of their religion. Religion is totally separate a belief. It is sick to control others because you think they should live and be like you.
I live in America. Here there is no difference between government and church. They are now one and the same. We are becoming the enemy with every passing day. Soon ppl from here will move to a Muslim country to live free.
Definitely religions. It has more of an irrational grip on its subjects than governments do.

Both are however only about the money.
Government.
Government.
Actually, haters like you.
Government, because individuals have no control over it.

True or false...a happy woman is one who has CONTROL in her marriage??

Marriage is a partnership. Women are equals to their husband and take different roles in the household. Couples that know their weaknesses and work to compliment each other achieve a great deal more in their home than others. God made Eve from Adams rib as a reminder that a woman is to be by our side not behind or in front of us!True or false...a happy woman is one who has CONTROL in her marriage??
I am in control when my husband is not at home.

When he comes home - He is the Boss!

Works for us!True or false...a happy woman is one who has CONTROL in her marriage??
From what I have heard-The Man is the Head of the family but the woman is the Neck!!!!!!!! The neck controls the head.
False - being equal is more fun. And being married is WAY better than being single.
False, women have never had so much control in marraige and yet they are now divorcing at alarming speeds-God said ''the wife is subject to the husband in all things''. [not sin of course] In 100 yrs. liberal p.c. won't be around--but God always will.
False!!
False: You have too be comfortable with yourself,an allow each other space......not Control!! . A woman should be treated with respect by her husband,an vice versa,otherwise it will be seen by the children,an they will become the same as they get older....If she is too controling,she should be single.
False.
a happier woman will stay single!
false. if the marriage is 50-50 then there should be no control problem and both should be happy.
False... I prefer my husband wear the pants in the family.
not all the time it depends on wat thw oman wants if she is controlliung then her having alot of control will make her happier but if she doesnt really care then just be nice and respect her and be ther for her thats the key to a happy woman.
FALSE a happy woman has control of herself and does not try to control others
False - I like it that my husband is the head of our house.
it works for me I'm always in control and if he don't like it he can leave its my way or the highway lol

What frightens you more: the false/controlling impact most Religions has on it's people or Government?

facial hair

True or false...a happy woman is one who has CONTROL in her marriage??

How common are False positives after going off birth control?

I went off birth control early in Aug. and was hoping that my cycles would be regular after wards becuase my cycles are normally irregular. I made a calender of when I might ovulate if I were on a 28 day cycle. So there was a possibility that I would get pregnant, but the chances seemed slim. So when day 30 came and still no period, I took a test and wouldn't you know, it says I'm pregnant! I took the clear blu easy digital one. It took me 8 months to get pregnant with my first, so this is a big shock! The first try?? But now I am doubting it. I surely don't feel pregnant, but then it is still early. I just went off birth control.

So do you think that it could be detecting birth control hormones and saying that I'm pregnant, but I may not be?

This never happened with my first baby after the month I went off birth control, it always said negative.

I called my doctor and the nurse told me to wait another week or so to take another one, but I really don't want to get my hopes up thinking I'm pregnant when I am not. It is making me nervous!!How common are False positives after going off birth control?
Run by the dollar tree and pick up some test (and yes they are actually good test, and are even better than some of the expensive brands, your just not paying for the pretty plastic covering that other brands have.) And test some more tomorrow morning.How common are False positives after going off birth control?
False positives are extremely rare. I got pregnant my first month off birth control. The hormones in bc are not the same as the hormone produced when you are pregnant, so the pill will not effect the test in any way. Congratulations.
There are only 2 real ways to get a false positive. If you were take HCG supplements, or if the tester came into contact with laundry detergent.

I think your pregnant! Congratulations!

Side affects and false pregnancy from coming of birth control?

I've been taking Yaz for birth control for about 7 months, and had unprotected sex with my partner about 5 days before the start of my period. For financial reasons, I haven't gotten my prescription renewed, so I'm riding out the month and starting again after 28 days. I've successfully had my period (victory!) but I'm still a little worried.

Since I've gotten off (it's been approximately a week and a half) I've gotten the following symptoms: nausea, cramps/stomachaches, varying appetite, little bit of mood swings, and been feeling pretty bloated. I DO NOT have swollen or tender breasts.

Now I've always been very paranoid/fearful about becoming pregnant so my anxiety may be causing me to be in a false pregnancy right now. Logically it would be a small cluster of cells so I shouldn't be feeling any sort of present embryo, right? I'm just curious as to the similarities of symptoms from coming off birth control. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Keep in mind it is too early for me to take a HPT.Side affects and false pregnancy from coming of birth control?
Some women have problems like you describe when coming off birth control. Usually, it is not being pregnant, but is instead from your hormones going back to how they are on their own. If the ';symptoms'; persist for another week to two weeks, you may need to go ahead and take a pregnancy test...just to make sure it isn't from being pregnant. Most of the time swollen or tenderness in the breasts happens before most of the other things you've mentioned and that is the main reason I think it's coming off the pill and not being pregnant.

You are absolutely right that worrying may be making you feel the way you are (and it's good to know you know that...so many women don't realize that).

Can being on birth control make you have a false negative htp??

I kinda had my period last week, very light. i posted a question up on here asking for some advice (thanks to those who answered). so i went a head and took a test before i started my b.c. again, but after i stopped my 'period' and i got a negative, but i think that it was too soon to tell. BUT since i have been on my b.c. for the last week would i be able to take another test sometime soon?? Or would the one i took be accurate enough so i can assume im not pregnant??

Im 24 years old. serious answers only please!! THANK YOU!Can being on birth control make you have a false negative htp??
No it would not affect the results.. Read all about it at http://www.peeonastick.comCan being on birth control make you have a false negative htp??
Ohh if you think you may be pregnant you really should stop taking birth control pills.

In order for a home pregnancy test to be positive, your hcg (pregnancy hormone) levels have to be at least 50, so sometimes, even though the tests claim to be accurate 4 days before you miss a period, they sometimes don't come out accurately for a week or so.

Stop taking your pill, wait a few days, and take another test.

Good luck!
First off STOP taking BC if you think you could be preggo! Go to the dr. and get a test done. Because of the hormones in BC pills it may be hard to find out.
I doubt you're pregnant. If you've been on birth control the likelihood of you being pregnant is slim.
It wouldn't matter if your are on b/c or not..... if your going to get a pos test then you will get one.
No. B/c works only because its supposed to make a fertilized egg unable to implant on the uterine wall b/c it hardens the uterine wall as if you are already pregnant. It was probably just too soon. Give it a week and test again. If that one is negative, then its likely you're not.

';A governmental that is controlled by a religious group is known as a theocracy.'; True or False?

I wanted to ask because there are a lot of people who really don't seem to know the answer.

With all of the hubbub surrounding the issue of ';separation of church %26amp; state';, I think it is important for people to know their facts.

Is a THEOCRACY a government that is run by a religious group?

If the United States were to completely unify the Constitution with Biblical Principles, would the United States cease being a democracy and become a theocracy?';A governmental that is controlled by a religious group is known as a theocracy.'; True or False?
Yes, like Iran or Israel.';A governmental that is controlled by a religious group is known as a theocracy.'; True or False?
A theocracy is a government where a religious institution has direct control over all levels of government. Implying that because people vote on religious grounds, the United States is a theocracy is not an outrageous statement. This is evidenced by the fact that abortion, alcohol, divorce, premarital sex, and homosexuality are all legal. If the Bible was the the Constitution, this would not be the case.

As for the second part of your question, it would depend on the means by which the Constitution was modified. Having moral laws based on religion in and of itself does not justify the label of a theocracy.
No not necessarily. There are many atheist who believe in the same moral principals the Bible has to offer.Historically the Bible is the first written moral law published.Our forefathers thought that it would be relevant for all generations to abide by some moral law and the Bible was most readily available.If we didn't have moral law things would be really bad. If someone killed my wife and the law didn't do anything because of separation of ';church and state'; I would be seriously pissed. I believe people don't like boundaries until their boundaries have been crossed.
True.

A lot of people are ignorant of what it means.

A theocracy is a government based upon a religious belief.

If the US were to be based on biblical principles we would not be a democratic republic, we would be a theocracy and the constitution would be abolished.

Will the birth control shot give you a false positive on a home pregnancy test?

I've heard that the 3 month birth control shot tricks a woman's body into believing it is pregnant. If this is the case, will those home pregnancy tests say a woman is pregnant even when she is not?

My girlfriend has been on the shot for a little under year and now believes she is pregnant because her regular bleeding has stopped. She hasn't had a period since she began the shot, just small amounts of bleeding on a regular basis. Now the bleeding has stopped and she's having other symptoms of being pregnant.

All of these symptoms have recently begun:

- Feeling Pregnant

- Breast Tenderness

- Frequent Urination

- Nausea / Morning Sickness

So, I am wondering if we should use a home test before seeing the doctor. But if it's going to give a false positive, I don't see the point.Will the birth control shot give you a false positive on a home pregnancy test?
No. Birth control doesn't contain HCG - pregnancy tests test for HCG.

Birth control contains estrogen and progestin or progestin only ... the hormones mimic pregnancy. But obviously, there is no pregnancy and no pregnancy hormone (HCG)Will the birth control shot give you a false positive on a home pregnancy test?
I was on that shot(i would advise she changes...It really messed my body up and is making it very difficult to conceive) and I stopped having periods but a little light spotting.

Its only 99% effective so she could be pregnant even if the guy is using a condom there is the chance. I would suggest taking a hpt the shot will not give it false readings it has none of the same hormones a hpt checks for.

good luck
There really is no such thing as a false positive on a home pregnancy test. The reason that these tests are only 99% effective is because 1 in 100 woman will get a false negative. If she uses a home pregnancy tests and it is positive than she is pregnant.
No it wont. Birth Control does not contain HCG which is what the pregnancy tests for

facial hair

Zionist Bankers prepare the world for the False Messiah(Antichrist) and give him control over ALL resources?

And your proof for this is....?Zionist Bankers prepare the world for the False Messiah(Antichrist) and give him control over ALL resources?
Wrong section. Please ask this question in Lunacy %26amp; Paranoia.Zionist Bankers prepare the world for the False Messiah(Antichrist) and give him control over ALL resources?
So what?

Loonies have been waiting for the end of the world for centuries,one or two more Armageddon lunatic won't make a difference....

True or False: Christianity was originally created as a way to gain power and control the masses?

';Religion is what keeps the poor man from murdering the rich.'; Napoleon BonaparteTrue or False: Christianity was originally created as a way to gain power and control the masses?
False. In Antioch, when the term was first used, Christians were a tiny and persecuted Semitic minority. It is quite unlikely they were under any illusion that any time in their own lifetimes there'd be any ';masses'; to ';control.';True or False: Christianity was originally created as a way to gain power and control the masses?
Well, if that was the case, it was a complete failure (for anyone involved in its conception).

Every apostle (including Paul) except John were murdered for their beliefs. Christians were being killed even while the New Testament was still being written. Power? Only if being thrown into prison, whipped, beaten, and finally murdered is power.

It also was certainly not created as a way to control the masses. Judaism did a much better job of that than Christianity. If anything, it was created as a way loose all power, but to free the masses!

Therefore, 100% FALSE!
Just like every other religion.
False
False
I,m a non-religious history nut. I never got that impression from the hundreds of history books that I've read. What was your source ?
I don't know about ';originally';. It may have been created as a mystery religion for the Hebrews, like the many other extant mystery religions of the era, but then was changed into a literal form and used to gain power and control the masses. I'm not sure we'll ever know for sure exactly how it began, since the Roman Catholic Church did its best to eradicate any and all documents that contradicted the ';official'; version.
TRUE!!! It is still being used in that manner.
True
Totally true. Created to gain power, control the masses and blackmail the lands and money from the people.
True all the way!!!!!!!!
The first 3 centuries of Christianity shows they were brutally persecuted. The first 30 popes were martyred.

And you call that a way to gain power and control masses? If anything, in todays world the real ';gaining power and control masses'; is the Dictator of Moral Relativism, which is diametrically opposed to Christianity.
Where did you come up with an idea like that? False.
False. I think that, at the very beginning, it was intended to be a true following of the teachings of a good man. However, I do think that it was corrupted rather quickly. It's pretty sad.
False.
Looking back at the early years (prior to Constantine in the 3rd Century) you would be hard pressed to prove your case that they had any ';power and control'; over the masses.
False... The teaching of Jesus were originally about love and compassion.

But... The Christian faith was derailed by Constatine and the Council of Nicea in 312 AD. It became the state religion and was then used to gain power and control the masses.

So, not originally, but later on.
Originally? No, Christ wanted love not power control

Historically? Yes, because people wanted power

Spiritually? No, because it speaks for another world

Socially? Yes, because it affected the whole world

Money Power? Yes and No
Have you met the masses? Nobody wants to control them. They are dolts... Their assets and finances on the other hand....
100% TRUE!
True
totally false.
False. It was a way to get persecuted and tortured by the Roman regime who regarded their emporer as a god.
True because it was the Romans who came up with Christianity an their whole means wus world domination they heard of Jesus in they're conquest of Africa an used it to their advantage over the weak minded

Anyone have a false positive due to birth control?

Saturday was the official 2 week late post. So I took 3 of the new response dollar tree tests. all positive. Well I took 1 of them saturday morning and it was positive. Then one before work sunday around 2pm and one after work around 7pm. So today one of my friends told me to try a clearblue test because the dollar tree ones aren't to be trusted, that one showed up clear as day PREGNANT. I've had no symptoms besides, no period, and kind of sore boobs. But I'm still cramping as though I'm going to get my period, just not as bad. But I'm wondering if the positive pregnancy test is coming from the hormones in the Birth Control which i stopped in June. I just don't want to make a fool of myself telling everyone. Then finding out at the doctors that I'm not.

Help please..?Anyone have a false positive due to birth control?
Four pregnancy tests said positive? Congratulations, sister, you are pregnant.

Birth control pills do not make pregnancy tests positive. It says that on the instructions for the test.

If you're worried about looking the fool, wait to tell people until after you get your pregnancy confirmed by a doctor. You can even wait longer than that. You won't show for about 12-14 weeks if this is your first baby. Longer if you're overweight.Anyone have a false positive due to birth control?
What Ive learned about preg tests: you may sometimes get a false neg reading from a cheap one, but I have never heard of a false positive. Any one that has ever gotten a positive (that Ive known) is pregnant. Also, cramping after a missed period can be normal in early pregnancy, but severe should be treated promptly in case its signs of miscarriage.
Birth control cannot cause a false positive result. While it contains hormones, it does not contain the hCG hormone, which is what is dectected in a pregnancy test.

You are pregnant. No one has that many tests come out positive and not be pregnant. Congratulations! Go see a doctor to get it confirmed and start your prenatal care.

Girl your most definitely pregnant, it's more common to get a false negative then a false positive. After taking the 2nd test I wouldn't question it, go to the doctors and have them give you a pregnancy test just to confirm it.
nope false postives are one in a million and the reason for this is because the only thing that sets off a urine pregnancy test to postive is the HCG hormone in a pregnant womans body thats detected in her urine...
Your definitly pregnant. Birth control cannot give you a positive pregnancy test, only a baby!
go to your nearest planned parenthood or gynecologist so they can confirm it.

Lyrics Poll--True or False--You can't control an independent heart?

If you want to keep something precious

You got to lock it up and throw away the key.

Can you also.... name that tune %26amp; artist?Lyrics Poll--True or False--You can't control an independent heart?
if you love somebody set them free. sting...=)Lyrics Poll--True or False--You can't control an independent heart?
onederful..., I'd have to go false cuz I have one and it can't be controlled---lol. Good tuneage off Sting's (Gordan Matthew Thomas Sumner---Gordo's) ';Fields of Gold'; album---I think. ';If You Love Someone Set Them Free.'; ';Free, free, set them free. I still say if they don't come back to you, hunt em down and kill em like a dog---lol. SORRY PETA people!!!
No, one can't control; what the heart will feel. You can control how it is seen to others though.

Sting and '; If you love somebody,(Set them free)';

I like ';When your heart is weak'; by Cock Robin better though.
I don't think you can control an independent heart. I don't know this song.
I'm gonna hafta go with ';Pitybluesboy'; on this one! :)
very true
true
Sting - Set Them Free?

True or false argument: govt control of economy is always disastrous, therefore no govt control is excellent??

cant no govt control also be disastrous?

t or f arg: govt control has always been disastrous, therefore govt control always will be disastrous?

t or f fact: govt control always has been disastrous? [all capitalist economies are mixed to some degree] [limited-fortunes [lf] capitalism wd save 99% of bureaucratic suffocation of economy - every world empire so far has been suffocated to death by bureaucracy - once you allow unlimited fortunes, you have to be endlessly making %26amp; policing laws trying [%26amp; failing] to control the myriad bad effects - eg, antitrust laws, anticorruption]True or false argument: govt control of economy is always disastrous, therefore no govt control is excellent??
False! Stop listening to BS like this, read the books and stay in school.True or false argument: govt control of economy is always disastrous, therefore no govt control is excellent??
True, in fact the more complex the system the more likely government controls will not have their intended effect but will instead create more problems.

';It is no exaggeration to say that if we had had to rely on conscious central planning for the growth of our industrial system. It would never have reached the degree of differentiation, complexity, and flexibility it has attained. Compared with this method of solving the economic problem by means of decentralization plus automatic co-ordination, the more obvious method of central direction is incredibly clumsy, primitive, and limited in scope. That the division of labor has reached the extent which makes modern civilization possible we owe to the fact that it did not have to be consciously created but that man stumbled on a method by which the division of labor could be extended far beyond the limits within which it could have been planned. Any further growth of its complexity, therefore, far from making central direction more necessary, makes it more important than ever that we should use a technique which does not depend on conscious control.';

Only a free market will work.
false.come on bro.without the government here in singapore, it wont be false and it will in turn affect the economic.
False of course.

Whenever business gets itself into trouble it comes running to the government to be bailed out.

For example, when the Savings and Loans scandal hit in the 1980s, the same Wall Street wonder boys who had been lauded as the flag bearers of free enterprise had to have their mess remedied by the tax payer.

In another example, the car industry always bleats on about how it is over regulated and that the Government interferes too much in its affairs. But during the 1930s, it was able to get the Government to build a national roads network costing billions of dollars. Unlike the railroads, who had to pay for their own tracks without government help.

Take also the fast food industry. Since the Reagan years it has successfully lobbied to reduce regulation about the way it can operate, such as not increasing the minimum wage. Yet at the same time the big burger franchises receive millions of dollars from the Government for training programmes for new employees. And everyone knows that they dont need training because the industry uses machines that are so intuitive and simple that staff can be hired and fired at will without down time for training.

Its typical business bullshit to say that no intervention is best.

A variable declared inside the for loop control cannot be referenced outside the loop true/false?

TrueA variable declared inside the for loop control cannot be referenced outside the loop true/false?
false

facial hair

If you're on a birth control pill and take a pregnancy test can you get a false negative.?

well there's always that possiblity, but I think you're good. if you really want to know go to the doctor's.If you're on a birth control pill and take a pregnancy test can you get a false negative.?
Birth control does not effect the validity of pregnancy tests.

You can get a false negative for many reasons. Such as taking the test to early, or other complications. Best bet is to go to the doctor or to wait 5-7 days after your missed period.

Thursday, February 4, 2010

True or false one key disadvantage of the contractor system of apparel production is lack of quality control?

The question seems a little vague or simply needs more context added.

However, if you are questioning the potential issues that come with an organization purchasing from suppliers, then the answer is usually FALSE!

Anytime any organization deals with suppliers or the production of some item or service (think of software programming - there are always bugs due to lack of communications), then there is a large potential for the item/service being provided to not meet the requirements. This is due to any number of reasons, the least of which is usually ';quality'; based in and of itself.

The largest impact is the communication process between the organization and its suppliers. Now you could call this a lack of quality communication, however, most people fail to see it that way.

Any supplier can demonstrate some level of quality control for what they produce. The real question is how well those quality control processes or procedures actually meet the customer requirements which is usually a breakdown in communicating what is needed by the customer (at least in production companies).

One of the sources below mentions the Ford SQI experiment. One of the outcomes of that effort was the Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG) supplier manual entitled: Advance Product Quality Planning (APQP). This book is all about how companies and suppliers need to work together prior to production to ensure good quality products are delivered during normal production cycles.

So if a professor in school is asking your question, I would say False due to my real life activities in industry and any number of articles that you can find at ASQ, Quality Digest, Quality Magazine and other sources of information. With that said, I am sure that you can always find a few examples of failure due to lack of quality control, however, even in those situations, I would still content that the root cause was lack of communication versus pure lack of quality.

You may also want to look into the Quality Management System (QMS) stuff at ISO. It always seems to come back to communication between the organization and its suppliers.True or false one key disadvantage of the contractor system of apparel production is lack of quality control?
True. It's always better to build quality into the design and manufacture rather than merely ';inspecting it in'; at the end stage. It's often necessary to station your own inspector at the contractor's site in order to remedy problems ASAP.

Could being on birth control give false negatives?

I am on ';Yaz'; Birth Control and I have been for a little over 2 yrs.

In July I messed up a few pills and I only got my period for one day. I took a test to make sure and it said negative. So I went on taking the pill the right way and I kinda got my period a day late but it was only spotting for 3 days. AGAIN, I took a test about a day or 2 after the spotting and it was negative. However, I have been getting some pregnancy symptoms. Slight tenderness of the breasts, nausea and dizzieness started yesterday, VERY hormonal/emotional(I am not an emotional person normally except when I am pregnant), and pretty tired. I am going to wait and see what happens with this next period that should be coming in a week or so but I am just wondering if because I am on the pill if it would give false negatives on the tests. I also read that the periods you get on the pill aren't ';real'; periods. They are forced from the pill or something like that. So again I am wondering if I am pregnant and the pill is making me get my period when I shouldn't be. I don't know if this makes any sense and maybe I am being overly paranoid but I just want to make sure. I keep getting symptoms on and off and it is making me nuts! lol Thanks!Could being on birth control give false negatives?
You say you ';messed up'; how many days did you miss? You probably are paranoid. I do not think the pill will cause you to have false negative. I always get the symptoms you are talking about a week before my period and just because you didnt before maybe since you are worried you are more in tune to every little twinge. The older you get the more symptoms you have when you get your period. I used to have 3 day periods with no symptoms at all and now its 7 days with the first 3 and last day being hell. Could being on birth control give false negatives?
When your take the sugar pills, the last pills in the cycle and you have your ';period,'; that period is just from withdrawing from the pill. It is not a real period. The pill will not affect a pregnancy test because the hormone it tests for is not in the pill.

Hope this helps
I think you're just being paranoid. The pill shouldn't change the accuracy of a pregnancy test and if it says negative and you are still getting your period, I think you are in the clear. If you need more reassurance, ask your doctor to do a blood test. Good luck.

France took control of Egypt in 1882 to gain control of the Suez Canal. true or false?

False .

Britain did and stayed on till Nasser nationalized the Suez Canal .

soon after this , the British left Egyptian land .France took control of Egypt in 1882 to gain control of the Suez Canal. true or false?
';As a result, the United Kingdom seized control of Egypt's government in 1882 to protect its financial interests, especially those in the Suez Canal.';France took control of Egypt in 1882 to gain control of the Suez Canal. true or false?
true but not over egypt france was one of the coutries that entered egypt claiming to protect their rights so they could control the cannal.

and by rights i mean that egypt was in debt to them along with great briten
That wasn't France. That was Great Britian.
false..

British did..
true...but it was england and france
false

Gun control has caused the deaths of millions around the world. True or false?

Check your History. Japan did not invade the USA after Pearl Harbor because most citizens were armed. England and Australia banned guns and their crime with guns went up dramatically. Please Read the Following....

Why The Gun In Civilization?

By Maj. L. Caudill USMC (Ret)

Human beings only have two ways to deal with one another: reason and force. If you want me to do something for you, you have a choice of either convincing me via argument, or force me to do your bidding under threat of force. Every human interaction falls into one of those two categories, without exception. Reason or force, that's it. In a truly moral and civilized society, people exclusively interact through persuasion. Force has no place as a valid method of social interaction, and the only thing that removes force from the menu is the personal firearm, as paradoxical as it may sound to some. When I carry a gun, you cannot deal with me by force. You have to use reason and try to persuade me, because I have a way to negate your threat or employment of force. The gun is the only personal weapon that puts a 100-pound woman on equal footing with a 220-pound mugger, a 75-year old retiree on equal footing with a 19-year old gang banger, and a single gay guy on equal footing with a carload of drunk guys with baseball bats. The gun removes the disparity in physical strength, size, or numbers between a potential attacker and a defender. There are plenty of people who consider the gun as the source of bad force equations. These are the people who think that we'd be more civilized if all guns were removed from society, because a firearm makes it easier for a [armed] mugger to do his job. That, of course, is only true if the mugger's potential victims are mostly disarmed either by choice or by legislative fiat--it has no validity when most of a mugger's potential marks are armed. People who argue for the banning of arms ask for automatic rule by the young, the strong, and the many, and that's the exact opposite of a civilized society. A mugger, even an armed one, can only make a successful living in a society where the state has granted him a force monopoly. Then there's the argument that the gun makes confrontations lethal that otherwise would only result in injury. This argument is fallacious in several ways. Without guns involved, confrontations are won by the physically superior party inflicting overwhelming injury on the loser. People who think that fists, bats, sticks, or stones don't constitute lethal force watch too much TV, where people take beatings and come out of it with a bloody lip at worst. The fact that the gun makes lethal force easier works solely in favor of the weaker defender, not the stronger attacker. If both are armed, the field is level. The gun is the only weapon that's as lethal in the hands of an octogenarian as it is in the hands of a weight lifter. It simply wouldn't work as well as a force equalizer if it wasn't both lethal and easily employable.

When I carry a gun, I don't do so because I am looking for a fight, but because I'm looking to be left alone. The gun at my side means that I cannot be forced, only persuaded. I don't carry it because I'm afraid, but because it enables me to be unafraid. It doesn't limit the actions of those who would interact with me through reason, only the actions of those who would do so by force. It removes force from the equation...and that's why carrying a gun is a civilized act.Gun control has caused the deaths of millions around the world. True or false?
Very true. I think perhaps many of your responders are not thinking about how many died in Germany under Hitler because guns had been confiscated, or Russia, or a great number of other places. The fact that Americans have the freedom to own weapons was a great part of why the Japanese during WWII decided not to attempt an invasion of our mainland (look it up - the great majority of Americans owned guns and the Japanese military knew it). It has long been said that those who forge their weapons into plow shares will plow for those who don't. The intent of those who founded this nation was to allow gun ownership not only for food and self defense, but as a check against the power of the government for they can not overcome an armed populace. I have no doubt that America's new administration will introduce much stronger gun control laws in the very near future that may well include a buy back program such as Australia went though about a year ago - to disastrous results for the safety of the population. We will keep our freedom as long as we are allowed to keep our guns. ...and personally - I'm keeping mine!Gun control has caused the deaths of millions around the world. True or false?
False. Gun control has been used as a tool by those that have killed millions around the world. Gun control is responsible for law abiding citizens not having a firearm in a situation where it would save their life or the life of another. Gun control is responsible for the criminalization of exercising your basic human rights. It is a huge contributing factor in the deaths of millions, but the actual cause is of course the criminals and criminal governments that actually do the killing.
Gun Control is ridiculous.

If our country were ever invaded, and the invaders, attacked the military bases and government centers first, then it would be up to the people to form a militia. You can't form a militia without guns.

Our country (US) and our economy is starting to weaken. We are more open to invasion than we have been for a long, long time. Some of you sit on your couch, too misinformed or lazy to care.

Criminals will get guns off the black market. Good law-abiding citizens won't. I'd rather have a gun while a criminal also has a gun than only a criminal having one. Plus, I'm probably a better shot than he is.
I like the way you are keeping score now!

Very well true! Because only where you have gun control laws, those that work above the law, and below the laws, will have guns! The average citizen will be unarmed! If someone threatens you, or your family, wouldn't you want to defend yourself?! By the time the cops arrive, it will be too late! The crook is long gone, you and/or your family member(s)might be hurt or dead!

Hey all of you liberals out there! Yeah! you know who you are. . . I am really sure that you are smart enough to read this! I believe it was Thomas Jefferson that said '; the reason why it is important for everyone to have the right to keep and bear arms is to keep our government from becoming a tyranny!'; Now with that said. . . You pass gun control laws, and I guaranty you this that criminal will just go to Mexico and purchase them down there and, trust me as I say this, THEY CAN, AND MORE THAN LIKELY. . . WILL SMUGGLE THEM ACCROSS THE BORDER! Yes! It is that easy! Also, you will have a black market for firearms, as well as certain other items!

Nazi Germany had gun control! Communist Cuba has gun control! The former Soviet Union had gun control! Communist China has gun control!

Hey (Whatever your name is this week) I am sorry that I had to add the above! I am hoping that we can find a cure for the mental illness known as liberalism!

EDIT: Hey solarianus! I think you miss read her question! Anyhow. . . Where there is gun control, there is a tyranicle government, and the politicians that love to take advantage of unarmed, law abiding citizens! History proves this!
Gun control is only for Law abiding people, criminals arnt going to care less.

In fact in the UK it is now easier to get hold of an illegal gun than it was before the ban. The ban was a complete waste of time.

What did they thing, all the criminals would hand them in as well Doh.
Guns don't kill people, bullets do.

And to me, gun control means being able to hit your target. So in that respect, your statement is true. But if by gun control, you mean keeping them out of the hands of law abiding citizens, your statement is false.
I could see maybe failure of gun control causing that amount of problems but not gun control itself. To be honest I am not really sure, but here is my stance on gun control. If you make guns illegal only criminals will own one. Why would you want criminals owning guns?
False, and inexcusably ill-informed.
false... The laws are for the people who commit the crimes not the law buyeding people
Don't feed the trolls.
False

Internal control and cash quiz- true or false?

True or False:

1. Internal control is mainly concerned with the amount of authority a supervisor exercises over a subordinate.

2. Proper segregation of duties accounting eliminates the need for internal control.

3. The effectiveness of internal control is partially limited by cost-benefit considerations.

4. Internal control is the responsibility of management.

5. Internal control is most effective when several people are responsible for a given task.

6. The responsibility for keeping the records for an asset should be separate from the physical custody of that asset.

7. Requiring employees to take vacations is a weakness in the system of internal controls because it does not promote operational efficiency.

8. The extent of internal control activities adopted by a company must be evaluated in terms of cost-benefit.

9. An effective system of internal control requires that at least two individuals be assigned to one cash drawer so that each can serve as a check on the other.

10. Only large companies need to be concerned with a system of internal control.

Internal control and cash quiz- true or false?
1. False

2. False. Segregation of duties is only one aspect of internal control.

3. True

4. True

5. False (I think, but not entirely sure). That seems to go against the segregation of duties idea.

6. True

7. False. Mandatory vacations have been known to reveal fraud being perpetrated by people who never take vacations.

8. True

9. False. Many hands in one till = impossible to know for sure who's responsible for a shortage

10. False. There's numerous cases in the news of small businesses being defrauded over time by their bookkeeper due to a lack of internal control.

facial hair

True or False - You can control who you fall in love with.?

If you think you can control who you fall in love with please tell me because my heart is breaking and I can't do anything about it.True or False - You can control who you fall in love with.?
I,m so sorry you are hurting right now. I know how that feels! But in time it will get better. Everything we go through in life is a learning experience. Sometimes the lessons are hard. But if you pass the test, you will be a better, stronger person for it. So cry if you must, but not too long. Then hold your head high. There is something better in store for you..... No, You cant control what your heart feels. But through experience, Your good since will tell you who is the best choice for you..... If we did have control, We would all marry the one our parents pick for us!True or False - You can control who you fall in love with.?
TRUE!!!!!

If you really love this person, let them go. Love is sacrifice, sacrifice of your own feelings and wishes. If you love this person then thier happiness would be the most important thing to you. Let them go and if they come back then you are meant to be together. If not, then the love you feel isn't mutually returned. And in that case it's better you not be with them. Anyway, the love you have is still pure. You can't make someone else love you back.

Hardest lesson in life!!!!
Since we surround ourselves with people we share common interests with this is a form of control that we have. You could find someone to fall in love with in any group of people you associate with..................is that controlling who we fall in love with ? In a way.
False. You might think you can, but it's basically impossible to control your feelings for somebody.
Sorry sweetie, the heart wants what the heart wants... There is nothing you can do about it.

Feel better, it'll be ok. I promise. In the mean time, cry your heart out...
True. You can be attracted to someone but you certainly don't have to fall in love with them.

Just don't obsess about the person and move on!
I think you can control what you do about your feelings, how you act upon them...
I dont think so.. maybe that's why I heard in some tv show '; you can cover your faces but not your desires';
True.

I do all the time.

But its too late for you I think... Sorry =(
You can't control your heart.
False
False.

-jay
False
False
False....

You really have no control over it.
sorry babes, you can't... i know all about it lol i fell for a guy who would never like me.

i wish i didn't waste my time!
As far as a broken heart only time can cure it .
false
true
false
of course

False negative pregnancy test results and birth control pills?

Don't get me wrong I'm not trying to get pregnant but as I'm on cerazette (progesterone only pill) it stops periods so even if I was pregnant I wouldn't know.

I was just wondering if contraceptive pills cause false negative results or not?

And how long after sex would I have to wait before taking a urine test at the clinic?

thanksFalse negative pregnancy test results and birth control pills?
now a days contraceptive pills work pretty well. they should not cuase any type of results for a pregnancy test because contraceptive pills usually contain progesterone and estrogen and pregnancy tests only test for a hormone (hcg) that is produced only after implantation(pregnancy) not hormones contained in contraceptive pills.it usually works to wait 2 weeks after you have sex to take a pregnancy test.False negative pregnancy test results and birth control pills?
that pill should not cause the pregancy test to be a false positive... not sure about a false negative..

you can wait 7 days after your missed period to buy a test at the local store... the clinic can probably tell faster than that.

I heard that the gov is planning a internet 911 false flag to get control over the net . Thoughts ?

My thoughts are that you've heard wrong. That theory is wackier than the 9/11 conspiracy nutjobs.I heard that the gov is planning a internet 911 false flag to get control over the net . Thoughts ?
It seems quite feasible, and after it's happenned it will have been inevitable, but who knows until then.

Gene regulation is the ability of an organism to control which genes are transcribed is it true or false?

mostly true -- I would say gene regulation also includes a few other things, but for a T/F question, go with true ... :)

False pregnancy results on birth control?

Is it possible to get a negative result on a pregnancy test while you are on the nuva ring but be pregnant?False pregnancy results on birth control?
anything is possible. my friend was on BC and had a negative test result and she was pregnant.False pregnancy results on birth control?
If you think you're pregant and on birth control, you need to see your doctor right away. The birth control can hurt your unborn!

facial hair

True or False? The Navigation Acts were designed primarily to control migration into the Americas.?

If you even tried to do this homework the answer would be really obvious. It is false. The Navigation Acts limited the colonies to using english ships for shipping trade goods. They did this to cut out Dutch merchants from profiting in the trade market.

Monopolies have little or no control over how much they charge for their goods.True or false?

True Or False??????Monopolies have little or no control over how much they charge for their goods.True or false?
False. Monopolies dictate prices.Monopolies have little or no control over how much they charge for their goods.True or false?
Yes they do have control over their pricing, however, if they want to profit maximise they too must observe marginal cost equals marginal revenue and price accordingly.

Like any firm they are dependent on a demand curve.
true. By now, all monopolies are regulated, i.e. the price is set by the government.
False. Since monopolies are the only one selling their goods or services they have COMPLETE control over he price.
true.....do you need an explanation?
false

Is this a true or false that mafia has control of banks in uk liverpool?

friend says mafia has kidnapped him and told him to drop charges for they hacked into his account while out of the country now he is back and has attorney trying to recover his account, they are still investigating this, do not believe these crooks have power of uk government of banksIs this a true or false that mafia has control of banks in uk liverpool?
absolute rubbishIs this a true or false that mafia has control of banks in uk liverpool?
Your friend must be a member of the tall story club, No crook as the power to control banks in the UK.
False your friend is spinning you a yarn
they have power to Influence Uk Government A sort of Family Yes
Pork pies.
I am sure they have great control all over the world in banks

POLL: TRUE OR FALSE: You cannot control how others act, but you can control how you react toward their...?

...actions? Typically speaking.POLL: TRUE OR FALSE: You cannot control how others act, but you can control how you react toward their...?
this i know is true, i also know at times it's very hard to not react, especially when there embaressing, rude, obnoxious and downright mean.i have an aunt thats like this and i truly avoid being with her at all costs.POLL: TRUE OR FALSE: You cannot control how others act, but you can control how you react toward their...?
True...I have to do something that under normal circumstances is difficult, but I have to bring my ex...and look like this is ok in front of my daughter....

So, I am in control of how I react, portray my feelings, and deal with the stress.

woo hoo.

I hate being a adult sometimes.
right i am always in control of my own actions. i cannot blame anyone for my misfortunes or mishaps. i choose not to be around folks that will take me out of character.
This is very true. I mean, if I don't like the way they act, I'm not gonna change anything by complaining so I might as well ignore them.
true
Very True statement! xox
True!
True.
That is so true,. v

Sunday, February 7, 2010

Thursday, February 4, 2010

Blog Archive

About Me