What do you think about this??True or False. The falling satellite that's going to crash into Earth is now being controlled by Jesus Christ?
have another bong towely
i amTrue or False. The falling satellite that's going to crash into Earth is now being controlled by Jesus Christ?
yes you do control the satellites
But Jesus can be foiled only by David Hyde Pierce and a device for generative integers uniformly at random between 1 and 20!
If True, then get down on your knees and repent of your evil ways now.
If False, then bend over and kiss your backside good-bye.
Yes, in the ultimate sense, of course. But not in some special unusual way, only in the sense that He controls everything.
Wtf are you on.?
Yeah.
He really works for NASA.
Oh My God... ITS TRUE!!!!!!
HEY GRAVITY IS ONLY A T-H-E-O-R-Y!! (lol...)
Caps Lock is cruise control for AWESOME.
Ah thats gravity and human idiocity.
Are you saying that there may be something to the ';Sky Daddy'; moniker?
True, but it will not crash into earth for another 200 years because Jesus can't figure out how to use it.
I'll say ';true'; because I do believe in God and His control over everything.
false!
Creationism proves there is no satellite. I learned it in Sunday School. Atheists, ruled by Satan, say there's a satellite just to test our faith.
False!!!.. I think its his dad thats doing the controling!!
Sunday, February 7, 2010
Americans: Has your zionist controlled media successfully ';prep'd'; you for the next CIA/Mossad false flag op.?
Goebbels would be proud of you.
Far right controlled FOX News admitted their Obama/Islam link is false. Can we end this now?
..finally, they showed some integrity. Obama isn't a Muslim, and didn't attend a Madrassa. I have the FOX videotape. Will the Far Right on Yahoo Answers now cease their rediculous smear attempts?
http://youtube.com/watch?v=jBVMcLhx6DIFar right controlled FOX News admitted their Obama/Islam link is false. Can we end this now?
bite my is wrong it wasn't retrated he same the day,it was retracted after the obama capaign mailed fox and cnn actually did what journalist suppose to do and went to he madrassa instead of sit back and sling mud.
and as the people who say barack obama is racist because his church likes farakan,then why the hell mitt romney isn't racist when his bible the book of mormon was written by a racist and has racist scripture in it!
and whats so hallirous is people who say obama is a muslim,obama this obama that when they get confronted about it will bklame it on the clintons,just look at the post above,all the people who blame this on clinton have been asking question about obama's pastFar right controlled FOX News admitted their Obama/Islam link is false. Can we end this now?
Umm Obama is an Islamic name. It rhymes with his best friend Osama.
WE DONT NEED TO TRY AND SMEAR YOU, YOUR OWN PARTY HAS BEEN DOING A GOOD JOB OF THAT.. ALA HILLARY CLINTON. WHAT GIVES DEMS A REASON TO VOTE DEM THIS ELECTION IS BEYOND ME.
I have never claimed he went to a ';madrassa.'; He was raised Muslim. That sir, is a fact. Now he is a ';blacks only,'; ';African'; christian. Much better right?
Perhaps for a minute, until they come up with a new smear.
The concern I had was confirmed on Hannity's show tonight, on Fox by the way, when an African-American Reverend, who is supporting Hillary Clinton, had a long discussion about how Obama has close ties with Louis Farrakhan and how ';everybody knows Farrakhan is a Racist';.....And the point he made was those who are racists in the black community who have openly denounced any respect or kinship with the white community, can get away with the racist remarks, whereas a white person stating the same thing about a black person, is considered Racist. He specifically mentioned Obama's pastor and political mentor, Jeremiah Wright, Jr. If the voters really want to know the truth it is out there. The concerns about Obama go much deeper than his Muslim ties/roots/family history/background.
That is old news. It was retracted the same day it was run. It still doesn't negate his being a racist ex-crackhead, which is simply a statement of fact. Also, his middle name, Hussein, is a Muslim name, regardless of how you try and spin it.
Edit: They retracted it 2 days later and I stand corrected.. Now on the the Muslim bit. At the public school he attended, he was listed as being a Muslim. The school required religion to be identified because a 2 hour prayer period was part of the curriculum. His step father was a Muslim, just like his father. He was known to attend the Mosque with his step father on occasion. Those facts are known and he hasn't denied them.
I was wondering. If I was running as a conservative and had attended a few KKK rallies with my father as a youngster, would the media defend me when I claimed that I was not a racist?
They will keep saying it either because they are ignorant or they don't want to look bad.
You imply FOX said earlier that Obama is Muslim. But I never heard any such thing from FOX news. So it isn't 'their' link. It is simply rumors that spread on the internet.
I think any time I have ever heard Fox News address Obama's religion is tell of his history which clearly shows he is no longer Muslim. And I think they have also addressed the ';black separatist'; church he goes to now.
We can and we should.
There is never a need to slight someone based on false information.
In Obama's case, there's plenty of legitimate reasons to not elect him President.
Such as:
1. He wants to give driver's licenses to illegal aliens (link #1)
2. He has attended a church for 20 years which all but bars Whites and other races from attending (link #2)
3. That same church pledges it's allegiance to Africa and not the US.
4. He refuses to put his hand over his heart when our national anthem is played (link #3)
--------------
Geez, Mike (who answered below). I've heard a lot of ignorant, paranoid answers on this forum before, but yours might be a new record. I personally have never spread rumors about Obama being Muslim, but with a name like Obama Hussein Barack, I can certainly see how that conclusion or hypothesis would be possible.
Given Obama's church just gave one of it's annual awards to Louis Farrakhan, a man who is both Muslim and a racist, it's not even remotely a logical statement to say that anyone who opposes Obama is a racist or neo-Nazi. The award was given to him for being a man who ';truly epitomized greatness.'; Now I don't know about you, but if my church did that, especially if I was running for President, but even if I wasn't, I would be an ex-member the very next day.
Personally I don't care what the color or sex of a candidate is. I want someone loyal to our country and it's people, someone who can unite ALL the people in our country and move our country forward. CLEARLY that is not something Obama is capable of, and it has nothing to do with his race (he is half-White after all).
Please put a little more thought into your answers before using terms such as neo-Nazi. You seem to be unclear on the concept.
and even if he was ....so what? This is America, a nation that prides itself on its religious tolerance, freedom etc. The fact people are considering religion as a smear attempt shows that America has not really progressed at all.
I wish... but unfortunately the Republicans that watch tv usually watch the Simpsons reruns, not the news.
tin foil's right. Hillary has been sending out stuff on Obama. Uh oh! Imagine that. One of your own.
And, you may now want to contact Hillary. Her peeps sent out e mails regarding Obama. And her advisor brought up his drug past. Sooooooooooo,don't try and pin it all on Fox.
PEOPLE!!! Stop with the Muslim or not question!! So what if he is a Muslim?! Since when does the constitution say that one must be a Christian in order to run for President? We are sounding as stupid as the generation of Kennedy did when they were scared that he would turn the country over to the Pope because he was Catholic.
If he is Muslim or not, it should not matter. Remember, Muslims are not the enemy--ignorant people are. Catholics, Protestants, Jews, and others can ALL be dangerous if they are ignorant. Senator Obama is not dangerous.
Americans, do not get stuck on the little issues. We are entering an economic recession and we continue to be in a war--lets not forget.
NeoNazis and conartists will do everything in their rhetorical news power not to allow someone that isn't a pure white and a man the Presidency. Will the wealthy continue to profit exorbitantly if a working class person becomes president?
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6737097743434902428
fox news is fixed and false ... everyone know that ... except for brainwashed sheeple.
They will never stop. Now that it's started it will just keep going.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=jBVMcLhx6DIFar right controlled FOX News admitted their Obama/Islam link is false. Can we end this now?
bite my is wrong it wasn't retrated he same the day,it was retracted after the obama capaign mailed fox and cnn actually did what journalist suppose to do and went to he madrassa instead of sit back and sling mud.
and as the people who say barack obama is racist because his church likes farakan,then why the hell mitt romney isn't racist when his bible the book of mormon was written by a racist and has racist scripture in it!
and whats so hallirous is people who say obama is a muslim,obama this obama that when they get confronted about it will bklame it on the clintons,just look at the post above,all the people who blame this on clinton have been asking question about obama's pastFar right controlled FOX News admitted their Obama/Islam link is false. Can we end this now?
Umm Obama is an Islamic name. It rhymes with his best friend Osama.
WE DONT NEED TO TRY AND SMEAR YOU, YOUR OWN PARTY HAS BEEN DOING A GOOD JOB OF THAT.. ALA HILLARY CLINTON. WHAT GIVES DEMS A REASON TO VOTE DEM THIS ELECTION IS BEYOND ME.
I have never claimed he went to a ';madrassa.'; He was raised Muslim. That sir, is a fact. Now he is a ';blacks only,'; ';African'; christian. Much better right?
Perhaps for a minute, until they come up with a new smear.
The concern I had was confirmed on Hannity's show tonight, on Fox by the way, when an African-American Reverend, who is supporting Hillary Clinton, had a long discussion about how Obama has close ties with Louis Farrakhan and how ';everybody knows Farrakhan is a Racist';.....And the point he made was those who are racists in the black community who have openly denounced any respect or kinship with the white community, can get away with the racist remarks, whereas a white person stating the same thing about a black person, is considered Racist. He specifically mentioned Obama's pastor and political mentor, Jeremiah Wright, Jr. If the voters really want to know the truth it is out there. The concerns about Obama go much deeper than his Muslim ties/roots/family history/background.
That is old news. It was retracted the same day it was run. It still doesn't negate his being a racist ex-crackhead, which is simply a statement of fact. Also, his middle name, Hussein, is a Muslim name, regardless of how you try and spin it.
Edit: They retracted it 2 days later and I stand corrected.. Now on the the Muslim bit. At the public school he attended, he was listed as being a Muslim. The school required religion to be identified because a 2 hour prayer period was part of the curriculum. His step father was a Muslim, just like his father. He was known to attend the Mosque with his step father on occasion. Those facts are known and he hasn't denied them.
I was wondering. If I was running as a conservative and had attended a few KKK rallies with my father as a youngster, would the media defend me when I claimed that I was not a racist?
They will keep saying it either because they are ignorant or they don't want to look bad.
You imply FOX said earlier that Obama is Muslim. But I never heard any such thing from FOX news. So it isn't 'their' link. It is simply rumors that spread on the internet.
I think any time I have ever heard Fox News address Obama's religion is tell of his history which clearly shows he is no longer Muslim. And I think they have also addressed the ';black separatist'; church he goes to now.
We can and we should.
There is never a need to slight someone based on false information.
In Obama's case, there's plenty of legitimate reasons to not elect him President.
Such as:
1. He wants to give driver's licenses to illegal aliens (link #1)
2. He has attended a church for 20 years which all but bars Whites and other races from attending (link #2)
3. That same church pledges it's allegiance to Africa and not the US.
4. He refuses to put his hand over his heart when our national anthem is played (link #3)
--------------
Geez, Mike (who answered below). I've heard a lot of ignorant, paranoid answers on this forum before, but yours might be a new record. I personally have never spread rumors about Obama being Muslim, but with a name like Obama Hussein Barack, I can certainly see how that conclusion or hypothesis would be possible.
Given Obama's church just gave one of it's annual awards to Louis Farrakhan, a man who is both Muslim and a racist, it's not even remotely a logical statement to say that anyone who opposes Obama is a racist or neo-Nazi. The award was given to him for being a man who ';truly epitomized greatness.'; Now I don't know about you, but if my church did that, especially if I was running for President, but even if I wasn't, I would be an ex-member the very next day.
Personally I don't care what the color or sex of a candidate is. I want someone loyal to our country and it's people, someone who can unite ALL the people in our country and move our country forward. CLEARLY that is not something Obama is capable of, and it has nothing to do with his race (he is half-White after all).
Please put a little more thought into your answers before using terms such as neo-Nazi. You seem to be unclear on the concept.
and even if he was ....so what? This is America, a nation that prides itself on its religious tolerance, freedom etc. The fact people are considering religion as a smear attempt shows that America has not really progressed at all.
I wish... but unfortunately the Republicans that watch tv usually watch the Simpsons reruns, not the news.
tin foil's right. Hillary has been sending out stuff on Obama. Uh oh! Imagine that. One of your own.
And, you may now want to contact Hillary. Her peeps sent out e mails regarding Obama. And her advisor brought up his drug past. Sooooooooooo,don't try and pin it all on Fox.
PEOPLE!!! Stop with the Muslim or not question!! So what if he is a Muslim?! Since when does the constitution say that one must be a Christian in order to run for President? We are sounding as stupid as the generation of Kennedy did when they were scared that he would turn the country over to the Pope because he was Catholic.
If he is Muslim or not, it should not matter. Remember, Muslims are not the enemy--ignorant people are. Catholics, Protestants, Jews, and others can ALL be dangerous if they are ignorant. Senator Obama is not dangerous.
Americans, do not get stuck on the little issues. We are entering an economic recession and we continue to be in a war--lets not forget.
NeoNazis and conartists will do everything in their rhetorical news power not to allow someone that isn't a pure white and a man the Presidency. Will the wealthy continue to profit exorbitantly if a working class person becomes president?
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6737097743434902428
fox news is fixed and false ... everyone know that ... except for brainwashed sheeple.
They will never stop. Now that it's started it will just keep going.
Nuclear Fusion in stars is controlled by the dependence of density and mass? True or False?
Cant find this in my Astronomy book. Please helpNuclear Fusion in stars is controlled by the dependence of density and mass? True or False?
Nuclear fusion in stars is controlled by temperature. In the case of our sun, it's another way of saying how fast protons move around in the core. The more gravitational pressure on the core, the faster those little suckers move around. If the gravitational pressure is sufficient, the protons in the core of the star are zipping along so fast that the temperature goes to around 10 million Kelvin (10 million degrees above absolute zero). That's where something interesting happens. The protons get close enough to one another to overcome the strong nuclear force (the positive charge) that normally keeps protons apart. The protons fuse together in the high energy collisions, emitting gamma rays and neutrinos in the process. That's your nuclear fusion. Lots of high energy gamma rays pushing outward from the core, holding the inward gravitational pressure in equilibrium. If the core runs out of hydrogen to fuse, it shuts off. Nuclear fusion stops. The temperature goes down. This causes the sun's mass to to start weighing down on the core again, there's nothing to hold up the star from further collapse. Eventually, the temperature in the core again starts to go up because of the increasing inward pressure. If the now-helium core can get to 100 million degrees Kelvin, helium fusion is possible, and once again the star is held up by the outward pressure of the helium fusion. Temperature controls. But mass/density and the force of gravity make it happen in the first place.Nuclear Fusion in stars is controlled by the dependence of density and mass? True or False?
Your question is non-sequitor.
As gas compresses, it heats up and gets denser. At some point the heat is enough to engage fusion. A star is born. Fusion isn't so much controlled as it just happens. The gas mixture and total mass are the most basic variables for fusion.
If you re-word the question, you will get better answers. Try again!
Sounds like this is one of ';those'; questions-the ones which are asked and seem to make little sense. It seems well explained above and I'd agree but I'm not an astronomer.
Look in your notes or ask someone who remembers very well what happens in class, maybe the professor worded something similarly that can point to towards what the real intention of the question is.
Nuclear fusion in stars is caused by the inward pull of gravity and the outward push of the energy produced by the fusion. In the different life stages of the star these two things constantly battle to maintain a balance.
Nuclear fusion in stars is controlled by temperature. In the case of our sun, it's another way of saying how fast protons move around in the core. The more gravitational pressure on the core, the faster those little suckers move around. If the gravitational pressure is sufficient, the protons in the core of the star are zipping along so fast that the temperature goes to around 10 million Kelvin (10 million degrees above absolute zero). That's where something interesting happens. The protons get close enough to one another to overcome the strong nuclear force (the positive charge) that normally keeps protons apart. The protons fuse together in the high energy collisions, emitting gamma rays and neutrinos in the process. That's your nuclear fusion. Lots of high energy gamma rays pushing outward from the core, holding the inward gravitational pressure in equilibrium. If the core runs out of hydrogen to fuse, it shuts off. Nuclear fusion stops. The temperature goes down. This causes the sun's mass to to start weighing down on the core again, there's nothing to hold up the star from further collapse. Eventually, the temperature in the core again starts to go up because of the increasing inward pressure. If the now-helium core can get to 100 million degrees Kelvin, helium fusion is possible, and once again the star is held up by the outward pressure of the helium fusion. Temperature controls. But mass/density and the force of gravity make it happen in the first place.Nuclear Fusion in stars is controlled by the dependence of density and mass? True or False?
Your question is non-sequitor.
As gas compresses, it heats up and gets denser. At some point the heat is enough to engage fusion. A star is born. Fusion isn't so much controlled as it just happens. The gas mixture and total mass are the most basic variables for fusion.
If you re-word the question, you will get better answers. Try again!
Sounds like this is one of ';those'; questions-the ones which are asked and seem to make little sense. It seems well explained above and I'd agree but I'm not an astronomer.
Look in your notes or ask someone who remembers very well what happens in class, maybe the professor worded something similarly that can point to towards what the real intention of the question is.
Nuclear fusion in stars is caused by the inward pull of gravity and the outward push of the energy produced by the fusion. In the different life stages of the star these two things constantly battle to maintain a balance.
CNN & BBC is a controlled media broadcast by the goverment . True or False?
I cannot answer for CNN but although the BBC are subsidized by the government with the TV license, it is self governing and is run by its board of directors and is not influenced by the governmentCNN %26amp; BBC is a controlled media broadcast by the goverment . True or False?
False.CNN %26amp; BBC is a controlled media broadcast by the goverment . True or False?
False.
true, but more like shadow/secret government. same people who print the money in your wallet. Rothschild/Rockefeller/Vatican
/Jesuits/Royals/Satanists
that's the red pill, what else is new?
False.CNN %26amp; BBC is a controlled media broadcast by the goverment . True or False?
False.
true, but more like shadow/secret government. same people who print the money in your wallet. Rothschild/Rockefeller/Vatican
/Jesuits/Royals/Satanists
that's the red pill, what else is new?
Is it either false that a person has free will or it is false that God controls everything?
If a person has free will, then a person determines their own actions.
If God controls everything, then He determines the action of a person.
If He determines the action of a person, then it is false that a person determines their own actions.
It is false that a person determines their own actions and it is false that a person determines their own actions.
Therefore, it is either that it is false that a person has free will or it is false that God controls everything.Is it either false that a person has free will or it is false that God controls everything?
no games oh please
GOD HAS THE ULTIMATE DECISIONS
you get freewill for this lifetime then it runs out...Is it either false that a person has free will or it is false that God controls everything?
These two points are a contrarity, not a contradiction. So it is not valid to assume that one is false if the other is true. Before we can make that assumption we have to define the first statement within the context of the second; i.e. ';Freewill means freedom from the providence of God, the laws of necessity, natural law, cause and effect, etc.';
That is exactly right.
It is also false to say that God is All Knowing and free will exists.
They cannot coexist. If God knows the future, then he created Lucifer knowing he would sin and create the need for Hell and eternal damnation for most of mankind. That makes the theory of a Loving God impossible as well.
Too many inconsistencies for any of it to be true.
yes a person does have free will and god does control everything the situation will stay the same but depending on your choice of action from your free will the out come will be different each time.
Nowhere in the bible does it mention free will. Many times throughout the bible it discusses god's predestination. Yet christians think they have free will. But they can't show us scripture for it!
free will. God controls what He owns.
Study ';Fractal Geometry'; and you will mathematically see how both can happen simultaneously.
Free will does not exist.
Romans 9:18
So then He has mercy on whomever He wills (chooses) and He hardens (makes stubborn and unyielding the heart of) whomever He wills.
Gods do not exist, and neither does free will.
I believe in free will, myself. But I understand your point that free will and determinism are mutually exclusive.
I'm sorry but did you just repeat that line you got me confused.
It is false that God controls everything. God relinquished control when He gave human beings free will. Which is why we are totally responsible for our own free will decisions. Which is why it is inappropriate to ask ';why did God let this happen?'; when some human beings commit an atrocity against others.
neither is false to me. i had this explained to me once as an essay a teacher assigns you to write. they will tell you how long it should be, what format to use, what the theme is, and then helps answer your questions or mistakes. this is the role of god. you, the writer, then fill in the blanks and come up with your story or essay based on what the teacher specified, but the writing is still your work, isnt it? you still choose what is put to paper when-you just have some guidelines. free will is there, so is a divine power.facial hair
If God controls everything, then He determines the action of a person.
If He determines the action of a person, then it is false that a person determines their own actions.
It is false that a person determines their own actions and it is false that a person determines their own actions.
Therefore, it is either that it is false that a person has free will or it is false that God controls everything.Is it either false that a person has free will or it is false that God controls everything?
no games oh please
GOD HAS THE ULTIMATE DECISIONS
you get freewill for this lifetime then it runs out...Is it either false that a person has free will or it is false that God controls everything?
These two points are a contrarity, not a contradiction. So it is not valid to assume that one is false if the other is true. Before we can make that assumption we have to define the first statement within the context of the second; i.e. ';Freewill means freedom from the providence of God, the laws of necessity, natural law, cause and effect, etc.';
That is exactly right.
It is also false to say that God is All Knowing and free will exists.
They cannot coexist. If God knows the future, then he created Lucifer knowing he would sin and create the need for Hell and eternal damnation for most of mankind. That makes the theory of a Loving God impossible as well.
Too many inconsistencies for any of it to be true.
yes a person does have free will and god does control everything the situation will stay the same but depending on your choice of action from your free will the out come will be different each time.
Nowhere in the bible does it mention free will. Many times throughout the bible it discusses god's predestination. Yet christians think they have free will. But they can't show us scripture for it!
free will. God controls what He owns.
Study ';Fractal Geometry'; and you will mathematically see how both can happen simultaneously.
Free will does not exist.
Romans 9:18
So then He has mercy on whomever He wills (chooses) and He hardens (makes stubborn and unyielding the heart of) whomever He wills.
Gods do not exist, and neither does free will.
I believe in free will, myself. But I understand your point that free will and determinism are mutually exclusive.
I'm sorry but did you just repeat that line you got me confused.
It is false that God controls everything. God relinquished control when He gave human beings free will. Which is why we are totally responsible for our own free will decisions. Which is why it is inappropriate to ask ';why did God let this happen?'; when some human beings commit an atrocity against others.
neither is false to me. i had this explained to me once as an essay a teacher assigns you to write. they will tell you how long it should be, what format to use, what the theme is, and then helps answer your questions or mistakes. this is the role of god. you, the writer, then fill in the blanks and come up with your story or essay based on what the teacher specified, but the writing is still your work, isnt it? you still choose what is put to paper when-you just have some guidelines. free will is there, so is a divine power.
The controlling statement of a switch statement can be an int or a float. True or False?
Which language are you using?
In Java, C, C++, the answer is False.
It can be an int, but it can't be a float.
In Java, C, C++, the answer is False.
It can be an int, but it can't be a float.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)